Entities mentioned:
- Dana White: Control, Power, Self-preservation
- UFC fighters: Self-preservation, Security, Pride
- UFC: Greed, Power, Control

Article Assessment:
Credibility Score: 65/100
Bias Rating: 55/100 (Center)
Sentiment Score: 30/100
Authoritarianism Risk: 70/100 (Authoritarian Tendencies)

Bias Analysis:
The article presents multiple viewpoints, including Dana White's perspective and the fighters' lawsuit. However, it leans slightly towards the fighters' side by mentioning the settlement and emphasizing the UFC's financial success.

Key metric: Income Inequality

Let me tell you something, folks - this story is a KNOCKOUT! We're seeing a championship-level power play by Dana White and the UFC, trying to keep their playbook under wraps. The fighters are in a defensive stance, guarding their wallets like it's the last round of a title fight. But make no mistake, this is a high-stakes game where the UFC is running up the scoreboard while the fighters are barely getting off the bench. It's fourth quarter, and the players are calling for a fair shake of the prize money, but the league commissioner is playing hardball. This isn't just a fight in the octagon, it's a battle for the very soul of the sport!

Entities mentioned:
- Zohran Mamdani: Ambition, Righteousness, Influence
- Elizabeth Simons: Influence, Legacy, Righteousness
- Jamie Simons: Legacy, Influence, Philanthropy
- Andrew Cuomo: Competitive spirit, Indignation, Power
- New Yorkers for Lower Costs PAC: Influence, Power, Unity

Article Assessment:
Credibility Score: 75/100
Bias Rating: 65/100 (Lean Right)
Sentiment Score: 35/100
Authoritarianism Risk: 25/100 (Generally Democratic)

Bias Analysis:
The article leans slightly right, focusing on the contradiction in Mamdani's campaign and giving voice to his critic, Andrew Cuomo. While it presents factual information, the framing emphasizes perceived hypocrisy in left-leaning politics.

Key metric: Income Inequality

As a social scientist, I analyze that this article highlights a significant contradiction between Zohran Mamdani's campaign rhetoric against billionaires and the acceptance of substantial donations from billionaire-adjacent sources. This disconnect potentially impacts income inequality by undermining efforts to address wealth concentration. The article exposes the complex relationship between political ideals and campaign finance realities, suggesting that even candidates with strong anti-billionaire stances may struggle to completely detach from wealthy donors' influence. This situation could affect public trust in political campaigns and potentially hinder genuine efforts to address income disparities in New York City.