Entities mentioned:
- International Olympic Committee: Control, Professional pride, Legacy
- Olympic Athletes: Competitive spirit, Recognition, Self-respect

Article Assessment:
Credibility Score: 65/100
Bias Rating: 50/100 (Center)
Sentiment Score: 55/100
Authoritarianism Risk: 40/100 (Generally Democratic)

Bias Analysis:
The article presents a balanced view of the situation, focusing on the rule change itself without favoring any particular side. It maintains a neutral stance in describing the motivations and impacts on both the IOC and athletes.

Key metric: Olympic Integrity and Fair Competition

Let me tell you something, folks - this is a GAME-CHANGER for the Olympics! The International Olympic Committee just pulled off a fourth-quarter play that's going to rewrite the rulebook. We're talking about a major defensive strategy to protect the integrity of the games. These athletes have been pushing the boundaries, trying to get any edge they can, but now the IOC is stepping up to the plate and laying down the law. It's like they're implementing a whole new defensive scheme to level the playing field. This move shows the IOC has that championship mentality - they're not just playing to win today, they're securing their legacy for generations of competitions to come. The athletes? They're going to have to adapt their game plan, find new ways to compete within these tighter regulations. It's a whole new ballgame out there, and I'm telling you right now, we're going to see some real strategic plays as everyone adjusts to this new normal in Olympic competition!