Entities mentioned:
- College Football Playoff Committee: Power, Control, Influence
- Dave Portnoy: Competitive spirit, Influence, Recognition
- Tennessee Volunteers: Competitive spirit, Pride, Recognition
- Mark Ingram: Professional pride, Influence, Recognition
- South Florida Bulls: Competitive spirit, Recognition, Pride
- James Madison Dukes: Ambition, Recognition, Competitive spirit
- Texas Tech Red Raiders: Competitive spirit, Recognition, Ambition
- Michigan Wolverines: Competitive spirit, Pride, Recognition

Article Assessment:
Credibility Score: 70/100
Bias Rating: 50/100 (Center)
Sentiment Score: 55/100
Authoritarianism Risk: 30/100 (Generally Democratic)

Bias Analysis:
The article presents multiple viewpoints from different analysts, balancing out potential biases. However, the inclusion of Portnoy's Michigan bias slightly tilts the overall balance.

Key metric: College Football Playoff Rankings

Let me tell you something - this CFP rankings debate is HEATING UP like a fourth-quarter showdown! The committee's game plan is under INTENSE scrutiny, folks. We've got teams like Tennessee and South Florida potentially getting an undeserved free pass to the end zone, while underdogs like James Madison and Texas Tech are fighting tooth and nail just to get on the field! It's like watching a championship chess match where some pieces are given unfair advantages. The Wolverines, despite being a perennial powerhouse, find themselves in the middle of the pack - but don't count them out! They're like a sleeping giant ready to unleash their fury on the gridiron. This rankings controversy is shaping up to be the biggest play of the season, and I'm telling you right now, it could be a game-changer for how we view college football's elite!